Legal Opinion
State v. Padilla
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 1, 1987No. 9971PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
Defendant appeals from the trial court’s revocation of his probation and suspended sentence, arguing that since he was still serving time on the underlying sentence and was not yet on probation at the time of the alleged violations, revocation of probation was improper. Our calendar notice proposed summary affirmance, and defendant filed a timely memorandum in opposition pursuant to State v. Boyer, 103 N.M. 655, 712 P.2d 1 (Ct.App.1985). We now affirm the trial court.
FACTS
Defendant was convicted of forgery and residential burglary and was sentenced to serve two concurrent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. BoyerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. HolterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- State v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. DeAngelisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. NealNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.