State v. Putnik
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Chief Justice:
¶ 1 A jury convicted petitioner of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, and possession of drug paraphernalia. After trial but before sentencing, petitioner filed a motion for arrest of judgment under rule 23 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure or, in the alternative, a motion for a new trial under Utah Rule of Criminal Procedure 24. On January 25, 2001, the court imposed sentence and entered a judgment of conviction. On February 12, 2001, the trial court denied petitioner’s pending motions. On March 5, 2001, petitioner filed a notice of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilson Supply, Inc. v. Fradan Manufacturing Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Bellion v. DurandUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. VesseyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LaraUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004