Legal Opinion

State v. Putnik

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2002No. 20010557PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

¶ 1 A jury convicted petitioner of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, and possession of drug paraphernalia. After trial but before sentencing, petitioner filed a motion for arrest of judgment under rule 23 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure or, in the alternative, a motion for a new trial under Utah Rule of Criminal Procedure 24. On January 25, 2001, the court imposed sentence and entered a judgment of conviction. On February 12, 2001, the trial court denied petitioner’s pending motions. On March 5, 2001, petitioner filed a notice of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson Supply, Inc. v. Fradan Manufacturing Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bellion v. DurandUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. VesseyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  4. State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LaraUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API