Legal Opinion

State v. Gardner

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2001No. 990569PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Chief Justice:

T1 The State has raised a jurisdictional issue in this appeal by a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, which defendant opposes. We deferred ruling on the motion and directed that the parties brief the issue for plenary review. We address this procedural issue for the guidance of the trial courts in this state.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

12 Defendant was charged with two counts of attempted aggravated sexual abuse of a child. He entered pleas of not guilty. In March 1998, the trial court denied defendant's motion to suppress and ruled that he had voluntarily and knowingly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. Watkiss & Campbell v. Foa & SonUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Swenson Associates Architects, P.C. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Facilities ConstructionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. JiminezUtah Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BozungUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  3. State v. PutnikUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BozungUtah Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API