State v. Vessey
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This matter is before the court on the State’s motion to dismiss without prejudice on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction because the trial court has not yet acted on defendant’s motion for a new trial. The motion to dismiss is denied because defendant’s motion for a new trial was not timely.
In May 1995, defendant was convicted by a jury of rape of a child, a first degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-402.1 (1995). In June 1995, after his conviction but before sentencing, defendant filed a pro se motion for a new trial and a notice of appeal. The appeal was…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Bonham v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Salt Lake Child & Family Therapy Clinic, Inc. v. FrederickUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Burgers v. MaibenUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Allred v. Utah State Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
4Cited by9 opinions
- State v. VesseyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- Kurth v. WiardaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Regan v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.