Legal Opinion

United States v. Garcia-Cardenas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 17, 2009No. 08-50117PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

Jesus Garcia-Cardenas appeals the seventy-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry following removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we affirm and remand.

I

The relevant facts are not disputed. On November 2, 2006, U.S. Border Patrol officers apprehended Garcia-Cardenas crossing into the United States from Mexico on foot. Garcia-Cardenas admitted that he was a Mexican citizen and that he was present in the United States illegally. Approximately two weeks later, a grand jury…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Martin Sanbria-BuenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. MezaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Miguel FonsecaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API