United States v. Miguel Fonseca
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Miguel Angel Fonseca appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Fonseca contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to address several of his sentencing arguments and that the sentence was substantively unreasonable because it failed adequately to reflect the considerations at 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Our review of the record indicates that the judge’s explanation of the sentence was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Rafael Baron-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Estrada-Espinoza v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fonseca v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010