Legal Opinion

State v. Chambers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 1, 1997No. 9506-1357M; CA A92075PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*338ARMSTRONG, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for assault in the fourth degree and resisting arrest. ORS 163.160; ORS 162.315. He contends that he did not validly waive his right to counsel. We reverse and remand.

At arraignment, the court advised defendant of the charges against him and discussed with him his right to counsel:

“[THE COURT]: You are entitled to your court appointed attorney if you can’t afford one, I don’t see the paperwork on that, are you waiving the court appointed?
“[DEFENDANT]: Yes, I am going to see one this afternoon. * * *
“[THE COURT]: You’ll talk to your own attorney,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. MendoncaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API