State v. Culver
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Defendant was convicted of several felonies stemming from an alleged assault. He appealed, arguing that the trial court failed adequately to warn him of the risks inherent in waiving his right to counsel. The state concedes that the record does not demonstrate that defendant’s waiver was made knowingly. Thus, the sole issue on appeal is whether we should remand to allow the trial court to conduct an inquiry as to the validity of the waiver or remand for a new trial. Because the waiver resulted in prejudice to defendant, we remand for a new trial.
Appellant was indicted for sexual abuse in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. ClardyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. ErbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.