Legal Opinion
Sloan & Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 1, 2011No. 10-1725, 10-1765PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
This case involves principally the interpretation of a construction subcontract. A dispute arose when a general contractor, Shoemaker Construction Company (“Shoemaker”), failed to pay a subcontractor, Sloan & Company (“Sloan”), the remaining balance on its subcontract. The appellant in this case, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty Mutual”), is the surety on the subcontract and the party Sloan has sued for payment on the surety bond. Sloan cross-appeals with respect to one aspect of its claim. For the reasons that follow, we reverse in part and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Lawrence v. City of Philadelphia, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Ricardo Garza v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc., and Third-Party v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Emerson Radio Corp. v. Orion Sales, Inc. Otake Trading Co. Ltd. Technos Development Limited Shigemasa Otake John Richard BondCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- The Thos. J. Dyer Company v. Bishop International Engineering Company and General Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Superior Steel, Inc. v. Ascent at Roebling's Bridge, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Toner v. GEICO Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Transtar Elec., Inc. v. A.E.M. Elec. Servs. Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- BMD CONTRACTORS v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Md.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Citgo Asphalt Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.