Legal Opinion
United States v. Citgo Asphalt Refining Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 16, 2013No. 11-2576, 11-2577PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Table of Contents
I. Factual and Procedural Background.190
A. The Tanker and Its Charters.190
B. The Accident.192
C. The Cost of the Accident. 193
D. Control of the Waters.:.193
E. The District Court Proceedings.195
II. Jurisdiction and Standard of Review .196
III. Rule 52.196
IV. The Contractual Safe Berth Warranty.197
A. Was Frescati a Third-Party Beneficiary of the Safe Berth Warranty?.197
B. The Scope of the Safe Berth Warranty.200
C. Was the Safe Berth Warranty Breached?.203
D. The Named Port Exception.205
V. The Tort Claims.206
A. Negligence . to o -3
i. The…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik FisserSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- UGI Sunbury LLC v. Permanent Easement for 1.7575Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Spartan Concrete Prods., LLC v. Argos USVI, Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Arthur Bedrosian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
- United States v. CITGO Asphalt Ref. Co. (In Re Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.