Legal Opinion

Transtar Elec., Inc. v. A.E.M. Elec. Servs. Corp. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2014No. 2013-0148PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal from the Sixth District Court of Appeals, we consider whether a provision addressing payment of a subcontractor by a general contractor in a contract between appellant, A.E.M. Electric Services Corporation, the general contractor, and appellee, Transtar Electric, Inc., the subcontractor, that uses the term “condition precedent” is sufficient to establish a pay-if-paid payment provision. We hold that the use of the term “condition precedent” is an explicit statement of the parties’ intent to transfer the risk of the project owner’s nonpayment from A.E.M. to Transtar.

{¶ 2}…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Skivolocki v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ricardo Garza v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc., and Third-Party v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. Bonacorsi v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. M.H. v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Supreme Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Superior Steel, Inc. v. Ascent at Roebling's Bridge, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Sanzo Ents., L.L.C. v. Erie Ins. ExchangeOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. United States Fire Ins. v. Am. Bonding Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Tera, L.L.C. v. Rice Drilling D., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Wildcat Drilling, L.L.C. v. Discovery Oil & Gas, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API