Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Justice.
The plaintiff brought this action for breach of a contract. Prior to the 5th of February, 1929, Mr. Mollerup, the plaintiff and respondent, who was engaged in the drayage business, had done considerable work for the Daynes-Beebe Music Company, the defendant and appellant. On the 5th day of February, 1929, the company owed Mollerup $584.25, due for services. Mollerup desired to secure a greater volume of business, and made a suggestion to that effect to the company’s business manager. The negotiations resulted in a contract. The contract was written, and consists of a bill of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Omega Investment Co. v. WoolleyUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- Doe v. DoeUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Holman v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Hoggan v. Price River Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
- Mayer v. FlynnUtah Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Christensen & Jensen, P.C. v. Barrett & DainesUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Jensen v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Jensen v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1981