Legal Opinion

Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1933No. 5223PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

The plaintiff brought this action for breach of a contract. Prior to the 5th of February, 1929, Mr. Mollerup, the plaintiff and respondent, who was engaged in the drayage business, had done considerable work for the Daynes-Beebe Music Company, the defendant and appellant. On the 5th day of February, 1929, the company owed Mollerup $584.25, due for services. Mollerup desired to secure a greater volume of business, and made a suggestion to that effect to the company’s business manager. The negotiations resulted in a contract. The contract was written, and consists of a bill of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Omega Investment Co. v. WoolleyUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Doe v. DoeUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Holman v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Hoggan v. Price River Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Mayer v. FlynnUtah Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Christensen & Jensen, P.C. v. Barrett & DainesUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Jensen v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Jensen v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API