Legal Opinion

Haley v. Highland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 2000No. 67402-7PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

— In deElche v. Jacobsen, 95 Wn.2d 237, 622 P.2d 835 (1980), and Keene v. Edie, 131 Wn.2d 822, 935 P.2d 588 (1997), we held that a tortfeasor’s one-half interest in community property, both personal and real, may be reached to satisfy a judgment for a separate tort committed during marriage. In this case we are asked to decide whether deElche and Keene should be extended to allow the use of a tortfeasor’s one-half interest in community personal property to satisfy a judgment based on a separate tort committed prior to marriage. We hold that these assets may be reached in the event a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Dayton v. Farmers Insurance GroupWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Brotton v. LangertWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Jepson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Erwin v. Cotter Health CentersWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Erwin v. Cotter Health Centers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Haley v. HighlandWashington Supreme Court · 2000

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API