Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 24, 2006No. 03-35695, 04-35279PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), insurance companies are required to send adverse action notices to consumers whenever they increase the rates for insurance on the basis of information contained in consumer credit reports. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681a(k)(l)(B)(i), lbSlmta). 1 The principal question before us is straightforward: Does FCRA’s adverse action notice requirement apply to the rate first charged in an initial policy of insurance? We hold that the answer is yes: The Act requires that an insurance company send the consumer an adverse action notice whenever a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Toys" R" USDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  2. Johnson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2008
  3. Ashby v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2008
  4. Centuori v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2006
  5. In Re Farmers Insurance Co., Inc., FCRA LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API