In Re Farmers Insurance Co., Inc., FCRA Litigation
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEPHEN P. FRIOT, District Judge.
Before the court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 945) and Plaintiffs’ Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Certain Affirmative Defenses (doc. no. 952). The issues have been fully briefed, and the matter is ripe for determination. Upon due consideration, the court concludes that oral argument in regard to the motions is not required.
Background
Plaintiffs, Harry Corl, Cynthia L. Hod-nett, Nyle Cearlock, Arlene Hancock, David L. Watts, Jr. and Donna S. Mobbs, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, have sued…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lowry v. Croft (In re Croft)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
- Phipps v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Hershey v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2011