Options v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
The central issue in this unemployment compensation appeal is whether Jamal Mack (Claimant), who performed healthcare services to clients of Quality Care Options (Company), did so as an employee or as an independent contractor. The compensation authorities determined Claimant was an employee. On its appeal, Company questions whether the record supports the conclusion that Claimant was an employee. Upon review, we reverse.
I.Background
Claimant works in the healthcare industry as a “direct care worker.” Reproduced Record (R.R.) at 57a. Company is a healthcare staffing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oliver v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Danielle Viktor, Ltd. v. Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Tech One Associates v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Glatfelter Barber Shop v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Stage Road Poultry Catchers v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stauffer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Michael Caison v. Project Support ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Weaver Hauling & Excavating, LLC v. Department of Labor & Industry, Office of Unemployment Compensation Tax ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Attain Learning Center, LLC v. L&I, Office of UC Tax ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- D. Silver v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.