Legal Opinion

Stauffer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 2013PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge COLINS.

Cathy Stauffer (Petitioner), an individual who does not operate a business, petitions for review of a decision and order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) holding that she was an employer of Dana C. Cramer (Claimant), whom she paid to provide child care when she was at work, and that Claimant was therefore not ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits under Section 402(h) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (the Law).1 The only issue before us is whether Petitioner was an employer, as the Board also ruled that Claimant is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Danielle Viktor, Ltd. v. Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Venango Newspapers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Beacon Flag Car Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Glatfelter Barber Shop v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. C E Credits Online v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Training Associates Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. A Special Touch v. L&I, Office of UC Tax Svcs.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. A Special Touch v. UC Tax Services, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. A.M. Kearsley v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Attain Learning Center, LLC v. L&I, Office of UC Tax ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API