Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 16, 1997No. AC 16325PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*713 Opinion

O’CONNELL, C. J.

The intervening plaintiff, Henk-els & McCoy, appeals from a summary judgment rendered against it in a negligence action arising out of a workers’ compensation claim. The sole issue is whether an employer’s right to intervene in its employee’s action, asserting a claim to recover workers’ compensation benefits from a third party tortfeasor, is subject to the applicable two year statute of limitations without regard to the timing of the employee’s action.1

The plaintiff, Charles Nichols, commenced this negligence action on August 4,1993, after he sustained injuries in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stavola v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  2. Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Division Drywall, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Packtor v. Seppala & AHO Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Lakewood Metal Products, Inc. v. Capital Machine & Switch Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Packtor v. Seppala & AHO Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Goodyear v. DiscalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. City of Stamford v. Szollosy, No. Cv97 0159496 S (Oct. 17, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  5. Dalfino v. Coady, No. Cv 95 0546808 (Feb. 13, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API