Legal Opinion

Dalfino v. Coady, No. Cv 95 0546808 (Feb. 13, 1998)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 13, 1998No. CV 95 0546808Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#123) The defendants move for summary judgment on the ground that the intervening plaintiff's action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

The facts underlying the present motion for summary judgment arise out of a slip and fall by the plaintiff, Robert Dalfino, Sr., that occurred on February 15, 1993, as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendants, Ethel Coady and Judith Ann Coady. The plaintiff commenced the present action by a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Doty v. MucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. 2830 Whitney Avenue Corp. v. Heritage Canal Development Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API