People v. Saelee
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtMurray, J.
*748In this case, we make clear that the prosecution is required to admit actual evidence to establish an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety in the second step of Health and Safety Code section 11361.8, subdivision (b),1 enacted as part of Proposition 64. We further hold that the standard of proof is proof by a preponderance of the evidence. Mere assertions of fact and argument by the prosecution, unsupported by evidence, is insufficient to establish an unreasonable risk of danger to the public, i.e., an unreasonable risk that the petitioner will commit a "super-strike" violent felony…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. ReddCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. Braganza CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. EspinosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Johnson 104/22 CA3 Case DetailsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- People v. Olvera CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.