Legal Opinion

People v. Romanowski

California Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2017No. S231405PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cuéllar, J.

*905 When California voters approved Proposition 47, they enacted statutory provisions with the purpose of reducing punishment for a broad range of crimes previously classified as felonies. What this case requires us to decide is whether theft of access card account information-an *906 offense that includes theft of credit and debit card information-is one of the crimes eligible for reduced punishment. We hold that it is. Although theft of access card information differs in some ways from other forms of theft, Proposition 47 broadly reduced punishment for "obtaining any property by theft"…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States v. HynesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. People v. Sherow CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API