State v. Rohda
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
This appeal from a judgment of conviction raises a sentencing issue. Specifically, we must decide whether the trial court erred in ordering defendant’s 76-month sentence to run consecutively to a previously-imposed 15-month sentence for burglary which was ordered executed on the same day that the 76-month sentence was imposed. We remand for resentencing.
On September 9, 1982, defendant and an accomplice took a young woman to a secluded area of north Minneapolis and raped her. In November, the two men were arrested and charged with criminal sexual conduct in the first…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. ElkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. PickettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- State v. CoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. HattonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.