Legal Opinion

State v. Rohda

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1984No. C8-83-701PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This appeal from a judgment of conviction raises a sentencing issue. Specifically, we must decide whether the trial court erred in ordering defendant’s 76-month sentence to run consecutively to a previously-imposed 15-month sentence for burglary which was ordered executed on the same day that the 76-month sentence was imposed. We remand for resentencing.

On September 9, 1982, defendant and an accomplice took a young woman to a secluded area of north Minneapolis and raped her. In November, the two men were arrested and charged with criminal sexual conduct in the first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. ElkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. PickettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  2. State v. CoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  4. State v. HattonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API