Legal Opinion

State v. Hatton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 14, 1987No. CX-87-210PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

We granted the petition of the state for review of a decision of the court of appeals reducing the sentence of defendant Mark Lamont Hatton. The issue concerns the limitations on the trial court in resentenc-ing a defendant after the trial court learns that the defendant’s correct criminal history score is lower than originally thought.

The facts are these. The principal victim, B., went to an after-hours party with a friend. The friend left early but defendant’s brother, William, told B. that he would make sure that she got home. Defendant, William, B., and one…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MortlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. HeinkelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. BrotenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. HattonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GlaratonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Staley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Staley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API