State v. Hatton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
We granted the petition of the state for review of a decision of the court of appeals reducing the sentence of defendant Mark Lamont Hatton. The issue concerns the limitations on the trial court in resentenc-ing a defendant after the trial court learns that the defendant’s correct criminal history score is lower than originally thought.
The facts are these. The principal victim, B., went to an after-hours party with a friend. The friend left early but defendant’s brother, William, told B. that he would make sure that she got home. Defendant, William, B., and one…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MortlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. HeinkelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. BrotenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. HattonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GlaratonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Staley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Staley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990