Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 2007No. A06-1102PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

Appealing from a postconviction resen-tencing on a multi-count sentence, appellant Marvin Johnson argues that although the postconviction court had the authority to reduce the erroneous portion of the sentence for one aggravated-robbery conviction, the court abused its discretion when it increased the duration of his sentence for the second aggravated-robbery conviction. Since Johnson expressly negotiated his original sentence through a plea agreement and received the benefit of that plea, and since his total sentence remained unchanged in either duration or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Townsend v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. RohdaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. CoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CubasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State v. JedlickaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt MikellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph ShaneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  5. State v. SouderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API