Johnson v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
Appealing from a postconviction resen-tencing on a multi-count sentence, appellant Marvin Johnson argues that although the postconviction court had the authority to reduce the erroneous portion of the sentence for one aggravated-robbery conviction, the court abused its discretion when it increased the duration of his sentence for the second aggravated-robbery conviction. Since Johnson expressly negotiated his original sentence through a plea agreement and received the benefit of that plea, and since his total sentence remained unchanged in either duration or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Townsend v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. RohdaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. CoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CubasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. JedlickaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt MikellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph ShaneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. SouderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017