Legal Opinion

State v. Nunn

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 25, 1987No. C6-87-964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

In a prior appeal this court affirmed appellant’s convictions, but vacated appellant’s sentence for aggravated robbery and remanded for resentencing. State v. Nunn, 399 N.W.2d 193 (Minn.Ct.App.1987), pet. for rev. denied (Minn. March 13, 1987). Appellant now claims the trial court erred in resentencing by imposing a concurrent sentence for the aggravated robbery conviction and resentencing him to a 60-month consecutive sentence for the second degree assault conviction when his prior sentence was a 60-month concurrent sentence. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Appe…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RieckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. State v. NorregaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. PickettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. RohdaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. State of Minnesota v. Martin David Hutchins, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Jose Armando Padilla v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt MikellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API