Legal Opinion

L. Moxon v. E. E. Ray

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1935No. 6465PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge CRITZ

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

1 The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case is reported in 56 S. W. (2d) 469. In the case of Kuntz v. Spence, 67 S. W. (2d) 254, this Section of the Commission adopted Judge Martin’s opinion in the instant case. The opinion in the Kuntz case, supra, settles the issue of misjoinder in this case in accordance with the views expressed by Judge Martin’s opinion. No good can be accomplished by further discussion here.

It will be noted that the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in the instant case contains…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Kuntz v. SpenceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  3. Monzingo v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Ray v. MoxonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Great American Insurance Company v. MurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Utilities Ins. Co. v. MontgomeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940
  3. National Surety Corporation v. DiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. American Indemnity Co. v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Wells v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INS. CO.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API