Legal Opinion

Freedman v. Katz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1929No. Docket No. 85, Calendar No. 34,112PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Defendant Alpert is an attorney at law who sometimes acts as loan broker. Lena Katz is his sister and lives in Connecticut. Alpert has made several mortgage loans in Detroit for Mrs. Katz. Freedman wanted to borrow on second mortgage, and a relative, for whom Alpert had negotiated a loan, referred him to Alpert. Alpert offered to obtain $2,500 for Freedman in consideration of $450, which Alpert said was a brokerage fee and Freedman said was called a bonus. Alpert looked at the property, examined the title, took a mortgage for $2,500 for one year, running to Mrs. Katz, bearing interest at six…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rogers v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865
  2. Stein v. SwensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Franzen v. HammondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Matteson v. BlackmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Dalton v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SargentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Fred G. Clark Co. v. E. C. Warner Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Phillips v. Dukes (In Re T v. Dukes)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  4. Vaughan v. Peoples Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Patterson v. AlbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API