Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Albert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 42, Calendar No. 37,522PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

In 1928, Bose Albert, defendant, acting through a real estate agent, signed an instrument appointing the Investment Mortgage Company her agent to secure a mortgage loan of $20,000 on an apartment building in Detroit. She agreed to pay the mortgage company for its services a commission or brokerage fee of six per cent., in addition to the cost of recording and continuing abstract, and other expenses incurred in perfecting title. The loan was negotiated, and defendant executed a note and mortgage for $20,000 running to plaintiff, Peter Patterson, as mortgagee. Patterson is the secretary and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Merck v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London, Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Dupree v. Virgil R. Coss Mortgage CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. Olmsted v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Church v. . MaloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Freedman v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abeloff v. Ohio Finance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Patterson v. AlbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Boyd v. LayherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Patterson v. AlbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API