Zurich Insurance v. Kings Industries, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
Kings Industries, Inc., (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Kings), appeals from the judgment of the trial court, sitting without a jury, which awarded plaintiffs $11,911.60 damages for losses by theft which occurred when their Kings burglar alarm system failed to operate as represented.
The case was tried on the theories of breach of contract, breach of warranty, and negligence. Appellant contends that the findings are unsupported by the evidence and that its liability on any of these allegedly applicable theories is in any event limited to $50 by the liquidated damage provision in its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Crestview Cemetery Ass'n v. DiedenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Eads v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Markborough California, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- City of Fargo v. Case Development Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Feary v. Aaron Burglar Alarm, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- HS PERLIN CO. INC. v. Morse Signal DevicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Hendricks Property Management Corp. v. Birchwood Properties Ltd. PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.