Legal Opinion

LaDuke v. Lord

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 9, 1951No. 4027PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.

The defendant requested and the Court granted the following instruction to the jury: “We have in law what is known as pure accidents; that is, accidents that occur without negligence or fault on the part of anyone. If you find that the injury sustained by the plaintiff was due to or caused by an accident for which neither the plaintiff nor the defendant was responsible, your verdict must be for the defendant.” It is claimed that while the instruction may be a correct statement of the law, it is not applicable to this case which involved a common and typical accident under normal conditions of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Naylor v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cordell v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Dyer v. Herb Prout & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Richard J. Lakin and Brenda Lakin v. Daniel Marr & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. Patterson v. CorlissSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Dupont v. ChagnonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API