Dyer v. Herb Prout & Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.
The plaintiffs appeal a jury verdict in the Superior Court {Gray, J.) for the defendant, an insurance company, on a cause of action sounding in negligence. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant, Herb Prout & Company, Inc., should have recommended that Mary Ann Dyer obtain uninsured motorist coverage of $500,000 to match the amount of her liability coverage. We vacate the trial court’s verdict and remand for a new trial.
The plaintiffs are Mary Ann Dyer and her husband, Joseph A. Dyer, the administrator of the estate of Amanda Dyer, the couple’s ten-month-old daughter. The injuries for which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Fenton v. AleshireOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- City of Phoenix v. CamfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- White v. SchnoebelenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Patterson v. CorlissSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Reinhart v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Randle v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Hancock-Underwood v. KnightSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
- Gagnon v. CraneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Cowan v. Tyrolean Ski Area, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.