State v. Johnson
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROCK, Justice.
The State appeals from the action of the Court of Criminal Appeals in reversing the defendant’s conviction and granting him a new trial. We are called upon to determine the current validity of the thirteenth juror rule as applied to criminal cases in Tennessee.
A brief review of the history of the rule and the action of the courts below is necessary to place this issue in its proper context. Prior to 1978, the rule that a trial judge in a criminal case must function as a thirteenth juror and weigh the evidence before approving a verdict of guilty was very well…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. CabbageTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Manning v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. BurlisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- State v. MoatsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. CarterTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BaroneTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- State of Tennessee v. Rodney StephensTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.