State v. Moats
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Justice.
We granted this appeal to decide the proper remedy when an appellate court determines that a trial court has failed to perform its function as the “thirteenth juror.” Historically at common law, the only remedy was an automatic reversal and new trial. Another option is a remand to the trial court with instructions to perform its duty as the “thirteenth juror.” We conclude that granting a new trial is the only remedy which will insure that the purpose and protection of the thirteenth juror rule is preserved.
FACTS
The defendant, Andrew Lee Moats, was indicted by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. CabbageTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. GraceTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- Bolin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. BurlisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by151 opinions
- State v. MixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BinetteTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Tidwell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Aundrey MEALS Ex Rel. William MEALS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANYTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.