State v. Carter
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Justice.
We granted this appeal to determine whether a trial judge’s duty to act as the thirteenth juror under Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 33(f), is mandatory or discretionary. We have concluded that Rule 33(f) is mandatory and requires a trial judge to act as the thirteenth juror. We have also determined, however, that where the trial judge denies a motion for new trial, an appellate court may presume, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that the trial judge approved the jury’s verdict as the thirteenth juror, without an explicit statement by the judge…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. CabbageTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. BurlisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- State v. MoatsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ReidTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BiggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- State v. AdamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- State v. BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.