Legal Opinion

State of Conn. v. Levi Strauss & Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 31, 1979No. Civ. No. H-78-455PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

471 F.Supp. 363 (1979)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

v.

LEVI STRAUSS & COMPANY.

Civ. No. H-78-455.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

May 31, 1979.

Gerard J. Dowling, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff.

Stephen V. Bomse, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, San Francisco, Cal., Robinson, Robinson & Cole, Hartford, Conn., for defendant.

RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND

NEWMAN, District Judge.

The State of Connecticut seeks to remand the antitrust damage suit that it brought in state court against Levi Strauss & Company (Levi Strauss), which Levi Strauss removed on both federal…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Wiring Device Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  2. Salveson v. Western States Bankcard Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
  3. Wisconsin v. Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2004
  4. South Dakota State Cement Plant Commission v. Wausau Underwriters InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1991
  5. Illinois ex rel. Scott v. Hunt International Resources Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API