Legal Opinion

Paul McKee and Thomas Husted v. Transco Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 24, 1989No. 965, Docket 88-9003PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

Paul McKee and Thomas Husted appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles L. Brieant, Ch. J., dismissing their complaint as untimely. The district court held that plaintiffs’ action against their employer was governed by a six-month statute of limitations period under DelCostello v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 103 S.Ct. 2281, 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983). We agree that this case is subject to the six-month limitations period, and therefore affirm.

I. Background

Paul McKee and Thomas Husted are asbestos…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Carrion v. Enterprise Ass'n, Metal Trades Branch Local Union 638Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Semper v. New York Methodist HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  3. Carrington v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  4. Guy Livingstone v. Schnuck Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. Rebecca Groves v. Communication Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API