Legal Opinion
TWH, INC. v. Binford
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 29, 2008No. 48A02-0805-CV-441PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
TWH, Inc., d/b/a Tom Wood Honda (“TWH”), brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration in this action on Jennifer Binford’s complaint alleging breach of warranty and fraud against TWH. TWH presents several issues for our review, but we address a single, dispositive issue, namely, whether the trial court erred when it denied TWH’s motion to compel arbitration.
We reverse and remand with instructions.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 18, 2006, Binford bought a used car for her son Aaron from TWH.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Zac Smith & Co. v. MOONSPINNER CONDO. ASSOCIATION, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Daimler Chrysler Corp. v. FranklinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- District Moving & Storage Co. v. Gardiner & Gardiner, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Town of Plainfield v. Paden Engineering Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Koch Development Corporation and Daniel L. Koch v. Lori A. Koch, as Personal Representative of the Estate of William A. Koch, Jr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Williams v. OrentlicherIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Pekin Insurance Company v. Jose and Carol Hanquier and Joseph HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- City of Carmel through its Redevelopment Commission v. Crider & Crider, Inc., and Hagerman Construction CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.