Legal Opinion
District Moving & Storage Co. v. Gardiner & Gardiner, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 10, 1985No. 1054, 1055, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLOOM, Judge.
This consolidated appeal arises from the entry of two orders by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County (Taylor, J.), each compelling appellant, District Moving & Storage Co., Inc., to arbitrate claims it had asserted against the appellees, Gardiner & Gardiner, Inc., and Fedco Systems, Inc., respectively. As we agree with Judge Taylor’s decision that arbitration was proper under the circumstances, we shall affirm.
In September of 1979, Hilliard & Bartko Joint Venture (HBJV) entered into a contract with appellee Fedco, a firm of architects, to design a storage warehouse to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gold Coast Mall, Inc. v. Larmar Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Shillman v. HobstetterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Charles J. Frank, Inc. v. Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Hamilton & Spiegel, Inc. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Jeanes v. Arrow Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Ex Parte DyessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Dickerson v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Curtis G. Testerman Co. v. BuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- CR-RSC Tower I, LLC v. RSC Tower I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.