Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. Partnership
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 18, 1997No. 65, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
We granted certiorari to review the holding concerning arbitrability made by the Court of Special Appeals in Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Assocs. Ltd. Partnership, 109 Md.App. 217, 674 A.2d 106 (1996). A condominium developer’s agreement with a construction contractor included a provision for arbitration between those parties. The contract containing the arbitration provision had been incorporated by reference into the contractor’s performance bond. The court held that the developer had not agreed to arbitrate its claim against the bond with the surety. As…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Gold Coast Mall, Inc. v. Larmar Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Exchange Mutual Insurance Company v. The Haskell Company, Rogersville Paving Company, Inc. John Mack Pierce and Mack SlaughterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- J & S Construction Co., Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Antonia Rota-McLarty v. Santander Consumer USA, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Aggrow Oils, L.L.C. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Dickerson v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- County Commissioners for Carroll County v. Forty West Builders, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Poole v. Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.