Legal Opinion
Town of Plainfield v. Paden Engineering Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 2011No. 32A04-1005-PL-280PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
The Town of Plainfield (“Plainfield”) appeals two orders of the Hendricks Superi- or Court, one granting partial summary judgment to Paden Engineering Co., Inc. (“Paden”), and one granting partial summary judgment to Merchants Bonding Company and Everest Reinsurance Company (collectively, “the Sureties”), upon Plainfield’s claims for damages for breach of contract and for payment upon a performance bond, respectively. 1 We affirm.
Issues
Plainfield presents for review the following consolidated and restated issues: 2
I. Whether the trial court erroneously granted…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Fresh Cut, Inc. v. FazliIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Reeder v. HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Tri-Etch, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alan Patrick McEntee v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Old Utica School Preservation, Inc. v. Utica TownshipIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ohio Farmers Insurance Company and S.C. Nestel, Inc. v. Indiana Drywall & Acoustics, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Entertainment USA, Inc. v. Moorehead Communications, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2015
- Dave's Excavating, Inc. v. City of New CastleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.