Pinkerton Bros. v. Bromley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Replevin by the Pinkerton Bros. Company against Joseph H. Bromley. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This case has been here once before, and is reported in 119 Mich. 8 (77 N. W. 307). A reference to the case as there reported will make a long statement of facts unnecessary. Upon the second trial both parties-introduced'testimony at length. The case was tried by a jury, who rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The case is brought here by writ of error.
It was, the claim of plaintiff, and it introduced testimony tending to show its claim, that the goods were obtained from the plaintiff by Bothwell by means of fraud, and that defendant was not a bona fide good-faith purchaser of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Whitaker Iron Co. v. Preston National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Cappon & Bertsch Leather Co. v. Preston National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Pinkerton Bros. v. BromleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Durrell v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Norris v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Bates v. FransonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936