Cappon & Bertsch Leather Co. v. Preston National Bank
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Simpson, J., presiding. Replevin by the Cappon & Bertsch Leather Company against the Preston National Bank of Detroit, Clarkson M. Snedicor, and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant bank brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Plaintiff is a wholesale dealer in leather. Defendant Snedicor was engaged in business in Detroit under the firm name of Snedicor & Hathaway. It is the *264claim of the plaintiff that in July, 1894, Snedicor came to its place of business to buy leather, and at that time represented himself to be perfectly solvent, and represented that he had in good accounts and stock in trade $50,000 above all liabilities, and also owned a piece of unincumbered real estate on Woodward avenue worth $50,-000; and that, relying upon these statements, during the summer it sold him goods; that on the 33d of November,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whitaker Iron Co. v. Preston National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- In the Matter of Federal's Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of Matsushita Electric Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Matter of Federal's, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
- Pinkerton Bros. v. BromleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Durrell v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.