Durrell v. Richardson
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Erazer, J. Replevin by Oliver H. Durrell and others, copartners as Brown, Durrell & Oo., against Henry W. Richardson, Thomas E. Hall, William B. Hall, and Emma H. Hall. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants Hall bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action of replevin to recover a quantity of dry goods and notions sold by plaintiffs to defendant Richardson, the plaintiffs claiming that the goods were obtained by Richardson by means of false and fraudulent representations relating to his financial ability, and without any intent on his part to pay for them. The defendants Hall Bros, hold a chattel mortgage of $12,-000, and the defendant Emma H. Hall, one of $2,000, each covering the entire stock of Richardson, of which the goods in question were but a portion.
*594The record shows that the defendant William B. Hah made a motion to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Warren v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Dailey v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Manhard v. SchottMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Sexton v. McDowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Peterson v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Improved-Match Co. v. Michigan Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Pinkerton Bros. v. BromleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901