Pinkerton Bros. v. Bromley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Replevin by the Pinkerton Bros. Company against Joseph H. Bromley. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff was engaged in the wholesale grocery business in Ohio, and had dealings with the Cambridge Fuel Company through Bothwell, its bookkeeper. Bothwell made an arrangement with one Axford to go into the retail grocery business as copartners, Both-well to furnish the money and Axford to attend to the business, profits to be divided equally. Bothwell stocked the store heavily, through successive purchases, of goods, mostly from the plaintiff, with whom he succeeded in establishing a credit for the firm by means of considerable payments from time to time. These payments were made by…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Austin v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Pennington County Bank v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Karibian v. PalettaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. GautieriSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1943
- Siano v. HelveringDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.