Legal Opinion

Powers v. Quigley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2008No. CC 0406-05930; CA A129463; SC S054925PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

This case requires us to resolve an asserted conflict between ORS 20.080(1), which governs the recovery of attorney fees in tort claims for $5,500 or less, and ORCP 54 E, which limits recovery of attorney fees after a party presents its opponent with an offer of judgment. We set out those provisions below. Plaintiff seeks review of a court order limiting her recovery of attorney fees to expenses incurred prior to defendant’s offer of judgment. Plaintiff argues that ORCP 54 E does not apply to awards of attorney fees under ORS 20.080(1) because those two statutes conflict and ORS 20.080(1) is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Fresk v. KraemerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. PearsonOregon Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Force v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kinzua Resources v. DEQOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. W. C. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. RusenOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Department of Human Services v. S. C. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API