Legal Opinion

Andrewski v. Devine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendant James J. Devine, Jr., Esq. for partial summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against him with the exception of that part of the first cause of action seeking damages for pecuniary loss allegedly sustained by plaintiff individually as the result of Devine’s malpractice. That part of the first cause of action seeking damages for mental and emotional anguish and pain was properly dismissed because “such damages are not recoverable in a legal malpractice action based on breach…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howell v. New York Post Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Estate of Spivey v. PulleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Harville v. Lowville Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Colton v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bluntt v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Passucci v. Home Depot, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Kaiser v. Van HoutenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Padilla v. Verczky-PorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Solar v. Fayetteville-Manlius School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API