United States v. McGee
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri
On Application for Leave to Intervene.
1Opinion of the Court
PHILIPS, District Judge.
The Pocohantas Lumber Company et al. have presented an application for leave to intervene in this suit. They claim to be creditors of McGee & Short, the original contractors for the construction of the government work involved in the principal suit. Their demand is based upon materials and labor furnished to said contractors.
While it does not distinctly appear on the face of the application for intervention the dates when such materials and labor were furnished, it is quite apparent from the papers and proceedings in the principal suit that it was not later than May,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ecoles v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Ragland v. WisrockTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- United States ex rel. Watson Flagg Engineering Co. v. WinklerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
- Van Gorden v. Ormsby Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Teachout v. Des Moines Broad-Gauge Street-Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Baker Contract Co. v. United States ex rel. PennockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
- Stitzer v. United States ex rel. VaughansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Rys. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1929
- United States ex rel. Proctor Mfg. Co. v. StannardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.