Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Watson Flagg Engineering Co. v. Winkler
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided June 8, 1908PublishedCited by 13 opinions
At Raw. Demurrer to the complaint by Metropolitan Surety Company on the ground that the same does not state facts sufficient to-constitute a cause of action against the defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
This action is brought in the name of the-United States for the use and benefit of the Watson-Flagg Engineering Company under Act Congress Aug. 13, 1894, c. 280, 28 Stat. 278 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2523), as amended by Act Feb. 24, 1905, c. 778, 33 Stat. 811 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 709).
The act, as amended, reads as -follows:
“Chap. 778.' An act to amend ah act approved August thirteenth, eighteen hundred and ninety-four, entitled ‘An act for the protection of persons furnishing materials and labor for the construction of public works.’
“Be it enacted by the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Baker Contract Co. v. United States ex rel. PennockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
- Illinois Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. PeelerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
- Arnold v. United States ex rel. W. B. Guimarin & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
- Stitzer v. United States ex rel. VaughansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- United States v. WellsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.