United States ex rel. Proctor Mfg. Co. v. Stannard
District Court, N.D. New York
At Law. Action by the United States of America, on relation of the Proctor Manufacturing Company, against Ambrose 13. Stannard and others, in which the American Hardware Corporation intervened.
Read the full summary
At Law. Action by the United States of America, on relation of the Proctor Manufacturing Company, against Ambrose 13. Stannard and others, in which the American Hardware Corporation intervened. On demurrers to cdmplaint in suit at law, commenced by the issuing and service of a summons and publication of notice required, under the provisions of the act of Congress approved August 13, 1894, entitled ‘‘An act for the protection of persons furnishing materials and labor for the construction of public works,” and the act amendatory thereof, approved February 24, 1905, and on motion to dismiss.…
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
This action was brought by the Proctor Manufacturing Company, in the name of the United States, against Ambrose B., Stannard, contractor with the United States for the construction of a public building (post office building) at Malone, Franklin Co., N. Y., in the Northern district of New York, under the provisions of the act approved August 13, 1894 (28 Stat. 278, c. 280), en*200titled “An, act for the protection of persons furnishing materials and labor for the construction of public works,” and the act amendatory thereof approved February 24, 1905 (33 Stat. 811, c. 778).
Ambro…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stitzer v. United States ex rel. VaughansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- United States v. McGeeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- Portman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Illinois Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. KelloggCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- Illinois Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914