Brister & Koester Lumber Corp. v. American Lumber Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
The basic question in this case is whether the parol contract for a sale of goods in excess of five hundred dollars, which the plaintiff pleads, is legally enforceable against the defendant on the ground (1) that there was a sufficient memorandum of the contract signed by the defendant (the person sought to be charged therewith) or (2) that a partial performance of the contract was accepted and acknowledged by the defendant.
The contract in suit was for the sale by the plaintiff to the defendant of approximately one and a half million board feet of. yellow pine…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Mason-Heflin Coal Co. v. CurrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Manufacturers Light & Heat Co. v. LampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Zurcher v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Target Sportswear, Inc. v. Clearfield FoundationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Conaway v. 20th Century Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Downingtown Industrial & Agricultural School v. Pa. Dept. of Education (In Re Downingtown Industrial & Agricultural School)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.